Guy Taylor represents his forensic document examination team and explains why the culture within the judiciary needs to change quickly

Guy Taylor is working with a larger team of very professional ladies and gentlemen who have first hand experience of how judicial process and court conduct can go badly wrong. Guy’s testimony examines real documents and discusses some examples that should stand as warning. On behalf of his team Guy here warns the judiciary that public confidence is very low and the only way they can begin to repair that public confidence is by a complete culture change.

The lesson to be learned by everyone is to have your ‘official’ documents forensically examined before accepting their standing. We can not longer rely on legal professionals or the courts to refuse to accept the very questionable documents. Many of these alleged court documents are in fact produced by bailiff firms and others with absolutely no court involvement. You have been warned!

The judiciary need to take very serious notice of the background to this presentation. The sheer scale of this criminal conduct that has been brought to the attention of the Dignity Alliance by hundreds of seperate people in just the few weeks we have been operational genuinely beggars belief! If this criminal practice of ‘artificially inventing’ official documents with intent to deceive does not stop immediately it will become headline news in the very near future. There is absolutely no way the jucidiary does not know about this which raises questions as to the honesty of all members of the judiciary and HMCTS. Shit sticks and the misconduct of the bad apples tarnishes everyone! Fraud and deception ARE NOT business as usual. They are a crime!

The intention of the Dignity Alliance event was:

to get this subject into the public arena

to inform The People of the facts and suggest available remedies to institutional corruption

to encourage knowledgeable and qualified people to assist our legal team/experts in processing a large number of cases — and many more to come

to defend the innocent and prosecute the guilty

to save lives (suicide being an increasing result)

to merge the work of various groups, bodies, and associations to form a single organised and professional investigation/ prosecution team

David Fabb of Alpa Industrial Group explains just why any entrepreneur and job creator should think twice about establishing in the UK

David Fabbs provided a hard-hitting exposure on just how vulnerable the business community is to hard-nosed banks and legal firms determined to make a fast buck at the expense of everyone else. The presentation explains how David had a successful and profitable manufacturing group in the Midlands that he built from scratch and created hundreds of good jobs. His business group was effectively taken from him by a bank and a lawyer practice, asset stripped, and a lot of shady people made a lot of money destroying what he had created. David is a soft spoken and very intelligent man who has learned to bounce back from very bad situations, however his personal testimony stands to warn entrepreneurs in the UK that legal process can be mis-used by rogues and why the small and medium enterpise (SME) business community should have little confidence in England’s judiciary. You draw your own conclusions…

Following David’s experience he has self-funded a new community initiative called Alpa Forensics intended to help others forensically examine documents and provide expert witnesses who will testify for you in a court of law. Please do get in touch with David and his team if you require formal confirmation on the standing of any ‘official’ documents.

The intention of the Dignity Alliance event was:

to get this subject into the public arena

to inform The People of the facts and suggest available remedies to institutional corruption

to encourage knowledgeable and qualified people to assist our legal team/experts in processing a large number of cases — and many more to come

to defend the innocent and prosecute the guilty

to save lives (suicide being an increasing result)

to merge the work of various groups, bodies, and associations to form a single organised and professional investigation/ prosecution team

Alpa Forensics
Email: david.fabb.8832@gmail.com

Neil Heffey exhibits and explain abuse of process and fraudulent documents referring to a real Council Tax hearing

Neil Heffey of Albien Law Advocates gives a stunning presentation to the newly formed Dignity Alliance at their inaugural conference held in Ashton-in-Makerfield on the 26th of April 2014.

Neil explains the abuses of process, fraudulent documentation, and dishonest collusion between the lower tier courts and local authorities in a single ‘criminal’ case taken against a lady for failure to disclose information pursuant to Council Tax claims. The outcome was that the Local Authority and its agents withdrew the case and costs have been awarded. There will be more exposure and headline news to come in the future on the back of this and we will make this public as soon as we are able. If you ever had any doubts that the public are correct to have zero confidence in a judicial system which is deceitful and opaque and does not answer questions, then here it is…

For those official disinformation agents out there that will try and paint this as an attempt to avoid paying their way, and launch an ad hominem attack on neil or any of the good people involved, the purpose of this lady challenging Council Tax was to prove the corruption of judicial process and very serious question regarding what and who is a Local Authority these days. The case was backed by over two years research and evidence leading to the understanding that the good people of Wigan are now being managed by a veiled corporation who have no actual public standing or merit. The lady has the money to pay the amounts demanded by this apparently private company called Wigan Council and will do so when some very basic questions are answered. Have you checked whether your local authority actually has legal personality and legal capacity? You might just be surprised when you do start asking those questions….

The intention of the Dignity Alliance event was:

to get this subject into the public arena

to inform The People of the facts and suggest available remedies to institutional corruption

to encourage knowledgeable and qualified people to assist our legal team/experts in processing a large number of cases — and many more to come

to defend the innocent and prosecute the guilty

to save lives (suicide being an increasing result)

to merge the work of various groups, bodies, and associations to form a single organised and professional investigation/ prosecution team

Please visit Albien Law Advocates https://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.albienlawadvocates.net%2F&redir_token=7FvG9jJ6J744bgnG0OO19TKiLSh8MTQwMDI2MTEzOUAxNDAwMTc0NzM5

Power of Attorney – an overview

A Power of Attorney is a legal arrangement whereby someone or something (called the Donor) gives authority (something authored/written) to another or others (called the Donee(s) or  Attorney(s)) to act on their behalf and to make decisions with regard to their financial affairs and/or their personal welfare. Note that a Power of Attorney Deed of Appointment is a private licence you create allowing someone or something to do something that would otherwise be illegal or criminal. Also note that an Attorney created under a Power of Attorney Appointment Deed is measured by his/her/its competence. Competence is a very important word when speaking power of attorney language. You surrender or gift Power of Attorney to people and organisations every day unknowingly. We’ll come back to competence…

 

An Ordinary Power of Attorney is usually created in circumstances where the Donor wishes someone else to act on their behalf in a situation where they are unable or decline to to act for some reason. An Ordinary Power of Attorney cannot be used in cases where the Donor has lost their mental capacity and will automatically terminate on loss of capacity. A Lasting (or Enduring) Power of Attorney is used in these circumstances. However, it must be created before the incapacity arises.

 

An Ordinary Power of Attorney may be either general (unlimited except by law) or limited (special) to specific affairs. A General Power of Attorney in terms of Section 10 of the Powers of Attorney Act 1971 gives the Attorney(s) an almost unlimited power over the Donor’s affairs and should therefore be used with great caution. It cannot be used in respect of any jointly owned property, any functions acting as trustee, personal representative or a tenant for life under the Settled Land Act 1925.

 

The Donor may appoint more than one Donee/Attorney to act on his behalf. These Donees/Attorneys can either act independently of each other or they can act together. Where the authority is joint and several, any of the Attorneys can sign any authority documentation on behalf of the Donor individually, whereas if the authority is joint, every one of the Attorneys must sign the authority documentation.

 

The Ordinary Power of Attorney need not be registered and will usually terminate either on a specified date or where the Donor expressly revokes the Power of Attorney by executing a Deed of Revocation. Important!

 

We have seen PoA in the UK arises under legislation from the authority of the Power of Attorney Act 1971. This recognises the equitable granting of powers – but we’ll save that for another day. Get your head round the legislative basics then we can later develop this further and demonstrate just how critical it is for everyone to know and comprehend…

Its not a big Act in size but once you start to understand its implications you will quickly realise that this is the single most important piece of legislation on the books, bar none!

 

This is the power that Government (local and national) claim to wield. They have assumed Power of Attorney over each and every one of us. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing in general terms but that implied authority/power is not strictly defined and this the Donee is able to abuse those powers. This is because we have not defined the powers we are gifting to them. Returning to the Power of Attorney Act 1971, it’s what it doesn’t say between the lines as well as the carefully sculpted content where we have to interpret. Do you think the power brokers would actually lay it all out for us in an easy to read way?

 

Did you know when you sign a mortgage contract, for example, you are handing over power of attorney to the finance company, who can in turn further donate these powers as long as they can argue it complies with contract terms? In other words they can take you cash and assets and invest them and do with the capital and profits as suits them. How many people know that you have surrendered those powers and how many can state the level of powers that you surrendered? Note the use of the word ‘surrendered’ here. This is the correct word to employ.

 

Any court or tribunal is simply an exercise of PoA. The Crown will assume it has an over-riding PoA over both parties, with the Judge (independent arbitrator Attorney) representing the Crown. You have agree to this by being a Citizen. Both litigant and respondent parties are deemed to be legal persons acting as PoA for the corporation or living beast that has been dragged to that room. The judge in a court of law is merely assessing the level of negligence and incompetence of the parties upon which to base his/her decision. It really is that simple when you take the theatre apart.

 

There are number of options available to you once you understand the very simple concept of PoA. Knowledge is indeed power! How many knew that sentence is in itself a direct reference to power of attorney? You do however need to avail yourself of the equitable and legal definition of the word ‘power’. Very important!

 

Now, we could expose the whole PoA abuses all day but we’ll probably leave specific instances for a later post if readers want it. For now we will just re-enforce the concept that a PoA can be surrendered or gifted by Deed (document) or deed (action or inaction). The 1989 amendment to that 1971 Act, section 1, does exactly that. It removed the requirement for a Deed granting PoA requiring a formal Seal and professional Witness. Why did they remove that? The bankers and finance trading houses in our loans and mortgages etc had a field day after that as they could then trade our assets on our behalf without having to actually tell anyone or have it recorded. They could trade and hyopthecate and securitise and re-securitise our current and future wealth. It can be argued that the formal process of Seal and signature was slow and cumbersome and a new 21st century trading floor needed to act in nano-seconds to changes in the markets, but at what social price?

 

Note that by innocently doing something or not doing something you could now be enmeshed in a web of problems. Once you study this subject you will see PoA everywhere. An example is a Driving Licence (your legal person is the legally competent person licenced to be in charge of the beast so if the beast does something wrong it is the Attorney that takes the kicking for negligence and incompetence). The performance of the Donee/Attorney driving (commanding) the physical beast behind the wheel of the vehicle will be valued in points being deducted from the licence so as to warn others, such as vehicle insurance policies, that he is a risk.

 

Now the reason we discuss PoA goes back to my earlier post about financial words replacing legal definitions. If you revisit ‘authority’ you’ll see that this is in every case authority granted by you or surrendered of gifted by you to a separate body to act on your behalf in a general or limited capacity. In almost all instances this is a surrender of powers by you, knowingly or unknowingly, however national emergency and military law can over-ride the requirement for your express or implied consent.

 

This is the cruncher! You surrender power by doing or not doing something.Did you know that for Power of Attorney the parties have to be identified? For me to assume Power of Attorney over you I would need your name, address, and some other means by which to specifically point you out in a crowd. This could date of birth or a national insurance number or other such numeric registered identifier. If you want to prevent someone adopting Power of Attorney over you it really is as simple as never, ever, ever surrendering your details to them. Never admit to a name or address of anything else until such time as you are comfortable doing so. If you are told you need to identify yourself by someone you can be assured that they are presuming (offering) Power of Attorney, and when you obediently provide the details requested you have allowed them to legally assume (take) Power of Attorney. Try it. Use alias names and jealously guard your private information. This is exactly what large corporations do when they act through a veil of companies and jurisdictions – and it works for them. You CAN do the same even at a much smaller scale. So what if it confuses people! Your job is not to make a pencil pusher’s life easier. Your job is to protect yourself and your assets. Only when you want to enter into a Power of Attorney relationship should you provide that information; and just for kicks don’t let it be unsaid – let them know you are granting Power of Attorney and make sure you do it by Deed of Appointment. You are now acting competently and removing all presumptions and assumptions!

 

Section 3 of the 1971 Act is the most important part of the most important Act (!!) because that is where the exit door is! I’ll explain that shortly if you can’t see it from reading it. We’ll discuss ‘revoking powers’ and ‘discharging duties and obligations’ in the next post. Most governments have been particularly sneaky here. You’ll start to see human rights in their true light and it is all about a formal transfer of power and authority from Us to Them. Again, more to come.

 

In the meantime read up on PoA and read that Act very very carefully. There is a PoA Appointment Deed template in the end of that Act that you can adapt and butcher to suit your needs. We’ll post it up on the new website when its finished for you to download as a legal template.

 

It is critically important that you now do not presume the meaning of words. As you consider ‘power’ and ‘attorney’ and ‘of’ and ‘authority’ and ‘deed’ you really must refer to a legal dictionary, a commercial dictionary and a financial dictionary. It is also a good exercise to cross-reference with a military dictionary too. Many of these words have different meanings in differing situations. ‘Court’ being by far the best example. There are free online dictionaries and also good older dictionaries covering every subject on archive.org for free. You have no excuse for not knowing about Power of Attorney and it is really quite intuitive. You do it naturally every day with your family and friends and workmates. Now we are just formally recognising it.

 

We will post up more on this subject however we would welcome anyone to share their own research and ideas with us. This is not just an academic exercise; as you will see this is how you can now flex your muscles and start re-defining what powers you have actually (in deed) surrendered. Its also surprisingly simple to do and you can adapt simple templates…it does require a working knowledge and a vocabulary first though.

 

rob b

 

 

 

Denis Curran on Food Banks “People are getting penalised for being poor”

Please, please watch this! The Dignity Alliance thoroughly supports wonderful people like Denis and others who give enough of a shit about other people in need that they do something about it. He stopped the select committee in its tracks with a beautifully delivered plea for compassion….

“Help support the Loaves and Fishes charity http://www.loavesandfishes.org.uk/don…

Food bank providers told MSPs it was “clear” that UK government welfare reform had been one of the drivers of the “terrifying” increase in the number of people using food banks in Scotland.

Denis Curran from Loaves & Fishes said the use of food banks was “not just growing but exploding” saying people were being penalised for being poor and the “heart of the matter is people are starving”.”

He makes a solid point about these multi-nationals avoiding paying the taxes they owe. The result? Starving poor people.

If you are moved by this do something. Anything. Please…

Official invite to get involved in the justice industry

We want to bring to your attention a Ministry of Justice initiative that is trying to get the public involved in their business. It could be argued that this is a fairly desperate measure resulting from the obvious collapse of public confidence in the new EU-style judiciary but we applaud the Ministry for seeking solutions.

http://open.justice.gov.uk/home/

(It would appear this does not extend to Scotland)

“Without public confidence in the justice system there is no functioning judicial process”

The Dignity Alliance has a positive core objective of improving public confidence in all our public services, therefore we encourage members and non-members to pick up on this kind offer and indeed ‘get involved’.

The site is well worth a read and the Dignity Alliance will be promoting our own ‘get involved’ project to assist the MoJ in this initiative.

Book recommendation – Micro-sovereignty

Never let it be said we don’t cover a wide variety of fascinating topics. Here is our recommendation for a very good paper (not actually a book per se) that brings together a lot of research into the subject of micro-sovereignty to get you up to speed. 

 

Self-Determination, Micro Sovereignty and Human Rights in International Law: A Trinity of Categorical Imperative Norms Through the Creation of the Doctrine of Micro Sovereignty

Sebastian Kornhauser

UCL

May 10, 2011

 

The paper can be found here. Enjoy and please share. Feel free to thank him for sharing his work and do please mention our name. 🙂

Sebastian is now based in London and can be contacted at this site which has turned out be a gem for solid research papers that we wouldn’t otherwise see. Good network building potential too.

If you have any particularly good reads you would like to recommend to our members and site visitors pertaining to political philosophy, economics, history, freedom, justice, democracy, dignity, anti-slavery, anti-bullying and all that good positive stuff then please comment with your own recommendation and we will post it up if its as good as you say.  😉

rob b

Financial definitions of court words – this will surprise you

One of our members stumbled on the term ‘call-in‘ in his local Borough Council constitution and this triggered an area where we may need to look much more closely; looking up financial definitions of apparently legal words! This is an eye-opener and probably explains court process more accurately than and rules and procedures of what passes for law in the UK these days:

Summons

noun

(plural) -monses

1. a call, signal, or order to do something, esp to appear in person or attend at a specified place or time
2. 1. an official order requiring a person to attend court, either to answer a charge or to give evidence
   2. the writ making such an order Compare warrant
3. a call or command given to the members of an assembly to convene a meeting

 

OK, so a summons is also a form of ‘call’. Note how you are called to the bench or called into court?

Call In

(transitive) to demand payment of   ⇒ to call in a loan

 

Call Option

It may help you to remember that a call option gives you the right to “call in” (buy) an asset. You profit on a call when the underlying asset increases in price.

 

Warrants and Call Options

http://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/071513/warrants-and-call-options.asp

Warrants and call options are securities that are quite similar in many respects, but they also have some notable differences. A warrant is a security that gives the holder the right, but not the obligation, to buy a common share directly from the company at a fixed price for a pre-defined time period. Similar to a warrant, a call option (or “call”) also gives the holder the right, without the obligation, to buy a common share at a set price for a defined time period.

 

Warrant

A derivative security that gives the holder the right to purchase securities (usually equity) from the issuer at a specific price within a certain time frame. Warrants are often included in a new debt issue as a “sweetener” to entice investors.

The main difference between warrants and call options is that warrants are issued and guaranteed by the company, whereas options are exchange instruments and are not issued by the company. Also, the lifetime of a warrant is often measured in years, while the lifetime of a typical option is measured in months.

 

Actual Authority

Specific powers, expressly conferred by a principal (often an insurance company) to an agent to act on the principal’s behalf. This power may be broad, general power or it may be limited, special power.

Also known as “express authority.”

Actual authority arises where the principal’s words or conduct rationally cause the agent to believe that he or she has been empowered to act. An agent receives actual authority either orally or in writing. Written authority is preferable, as it is somewhat difficult to establish authority that is given verbally. In a corporation, written express authority includes bylaws and resolutions from directors’ meetings which grant the authorized person permission to carry out a definite act on behalf of the corporation.

Read that last sentence again!!!

Implied Authority

An agent with the jurisdiction to perform acts which are reasonably necessary to accomplish the purpose of an organization. Under contract law, implied authority figures have the ability to make a legally binding contract on behalf of another person or company.

 

Read that last sentence again!!!

To be inspired, the following short videos of an interview with an American civil rights activist and investigator by the name of Dr Shirley Moore open up a very dark place indeed, which are connected to this topic of court business and finances. She provides alleged evidence of what are termed Judges Slush Funds.

Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtHCIXVb_eo

Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_lwzj8DY_U

Part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gKVNKCiGMpM

Dr Moore is tired as you will note from the videos. She had been working long hours on a criminal case. Focus on the documents and the explanation…

It is truly shocking what is claimed to be happening in all courts in the United States. While we have no evidence of similar conduct here in the UK as yet we invite whistleblowers and people in the know to come talk to us. Obviously any identities will be treated with absolute confidence and your anonymity is assured. We do have some information but are holding our cards to our chest at this time…

Email: admin@dignityalliance.com

Land post: Dignity Alliance, PO Box 206, Bolton BL1 9WE

So it would appear that the habit of the Courts referring to their activities as “business” might be more relevant than was thought?

You decide…..!

 

If you can help us investigate this please contact admin@dignityalliance.com

Our declared intent is merely to improve the public’s confidence in our judicial system.

“Without the confidence of the public in our judicial process then there is no functioning judiciary…” Ministry of Justice

 

Comments and input always welcomed

 

Can you be declared mentally ill merely for asking questions in the UK?

Fixated Threat Assessment Centre
http://psychiatricnews.wordpress.com/2007/06/22/fixated-threat-assessment-centre/

“The UK government has established a secretive new police unit a la George Orwell with the powers to detain anyone for any length of time without any due process.

The shadowy unit called the Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTAC) was covertly established in 2006. The unit includes the services of police psychiatrists. Why? For one very good reason, and one reason only: psychiatrists operate above the law. They can detain ANYONE AT ANY TIME AND FOR NO MORE REASON THAN THEIR STATED OPINION THAT THE PERSON MAY BE A DANGER TO THEMSELVES OR TO OTHERS…..”

http://exopolitics.blogs.com/breaking_news/2014/05/urgent-assistance-request-uk-grenadier-soldier-unlawfully-committed-to-mental-hospital-for-6-months-asking-questions-about-q.html

UK Grenadier soldier unlawfully committed to mental hospital for 6 months for asking questions about Queen’s status under Common Law court
“STAFFORDSHIRE, UK May 9, 2014- UK Grenadier soldier Vivian Cunningham has been committed to 6 months in a mental hospital for asking lawful quesTions about the status of UK Queen Elizabeth II…..
“Cunningham has been committed under the notorious “Fixated Threat” law, which criminalizes opinion in England, and classifies the criticism of any political figure as a mental disorder.
FROM Barbara Watson “I have just spoken to Vivian Cunningham who informed me that the Hospital have carried out their threat and have detained him for another six months, under Section 3.“

For those who haven’t been following alternative news here is the background to this story http://itccs.org/category/the-international-common-law-court-of-justice/

This post is not necessarily any comment on the ITCCS and their indictments but it is to express our shock that someone can be sectioned as mad just for asking questions in 21st Century Britain. Land of the free, remember? Even more shocking that serving soldier will lose 6 months of his life under arbitrary and draconian legislation dreamed up under anti-terrorism laws.

We at the Dignity Alliance support Grenadier Cunningham and everyone else that asks questions. Only traitors, criminals, and tyrants fear questions.

Sectioning someone as deranged is a cruel attack on a that man’s dignity.

 

For those that still ask questions and are not quivering in terror at the thought of men in white coats kicking down your front door at midnight to take you away please do absorb the information here that derives straight from the Royal website (now strangely under the control of the Government webmaster) http://www.royal.gov.uk/MonarchUK/Queenandthelaw/HowUKandEUlawaffectTheQueen.aspx

“As a national of the United Kingdom, The Queen is a citizen of the European Union, but that in no way affects her prerogatives and responsibilities as the Sovereign.”

Some would suggest that some very serious questions need asking, however some people have been asking….
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/citizen_or_monarch#comment-17175

A fairly simple and straightforward question was asked of the Attorney General’s Office:

“Dear Attorney General’s Office,

1. Can you please clarify the position of our Sovereign Queen
Elizabeth 1st and 2nd post-Lisbon Treaty, in relation to the
country and her subjects? Is HM now a citizen of the EU, subject to
the same laws and privileges as any other citizen, or are
exemptions in place? Has this constitutional change altered her
formal title?

I would be most grateful if you could provide as full an answer as
possible.

2. Following the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty by our Sovereign
where does a member of the public stand who has sworn a solemn oath
as a former member of HM Armed Forces to his Sovereign, PRE-Lisbon
Treaty? To clarify, the Solemn Oath is:

“I, NAME, do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance
to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth, her heirs and successors, according
to law. So help me God.”

3. Can you confirm which Law(s) are now being referred to in this
Solemn Oath POST-Lisbon Treaty?

4. Is it the case that all Solemn Oaths, as above, made
specifically to our Sovereign Queen pre-Lisbon Treaty are now
annulled and require to be re-taken?  “

The Attorney General’s Office did not answer the question citing mainly that a response was not in the public interest. That was answer enough. Do we still have a Queen as a functioning office and head of state of a constitutional democracy or is she now just equal to the rest of us being a citizen of the EU? As a British national this would mean she carried a passport issued not in her name but in the name of some Secretary of State. You tell us! Everyone in ‘authority’ so far either dodges an answer or supplies blatantly incorrect waffle.

We have it from one source that The Queen’s title on her coronation day was:

“Her Majesty Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of Great Britain, Ireland and the British Dominions beyond the Seas Queen, Defender of the Faith,Duchess of Edinburgh, Countess of Merioneth, Baroness Greenwich,Duke of Lancaster, Lord of Mann, Duke of Normandy, Sovereign of the Most Noble Order of the Garter, Sovereign of the Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle, Sovereign of the Most Honourable Order of the Bath, Sovereign of the Most Distinguished Order of Saint Michael and Saint George, Sovereign of the Distinguished Service Order, Sovereign of the Order of Merit, Sovereign of the Imperial Service Order, Sovereign of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire, Sovereign of the Order of the Companions of Honour, Sovereign of the Royal Victorian Order, Sovereign of the Most Venerable Order of the Hospital of St John of Jerusalem.“

 

This differed from the much shorter version the Rt Hon Henry Bellingham provided as Minister in charge of royal protocol.

Are they now making it up as they go along in their confidence that no dumb Brit will bother to ask these questions?

Lesson: When people shout at you and order you not to ask questions then that is exactly the time you SHOULD be asking questions. We Brits used to be left bewildered at the thought that the Nazis took control of Germany and so many of the population stayed silent. “It would never have happened here”, was heard more than once.

Really???

This isn’t mad conspiracy stuff dear reader. Please do ask questions yourself and report back your own findings. If you are too afraid to post questions off then that in itself is your answer.

 

Note: This is not an anti-monarchy comment. It is merely attentive citizens and former servicemen asking pertinent questions in the hope that we are not sectioned for so doing; as was Grenadier Cunningham. If you’d like to contact Grenadier Cunningham to try and answer his questions or enquire into his health, his current abode is reported to be:

St Georges Hospital
Corporation Street
Stafford
Staffordshire
ST16 3AG

Telephone: 01785 221319 ext 5045 (24hrs, 7 Days a Week)

E-mail: tom.tunnicliffe@sssft.nhs.uk

 

Thank you.

 

rob b

Melanie Strickland explains what the Community Bill of Rights is

This is an external video from the Occupy movement in Britain. We’ve posted this video as it presents an excellent idea and concept – draughting your own local Bill of Rights for your area/district/constituency.

We have noticed that in Local Authority constitutions the ‘rights’ that inhabitants and residents have are limited to basically doing what you are told. There are also no mentions of those essential freedoms we have that those rights are there to protect. This needs addressed and the Dignity Alliance are focussing on this as a priority campaign.

The work of Melanie et al stems from a movement in the United States called the Community Rights Movement which has had great success.

Also recommended to get a flavour of what this movement are achieving is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQ9J2JlFysk where Paul Cienfuegos provides a background. The creation of a community Bill of Rights ends the monopoly of corporate interests in our local communities and returns power back to the people. Democracy in action.

Comments and expressions of interest welcomed and you are invited to email us at admin@dignityalliance.com if you would like to get involved here in the UK on this issue.